Question
What deeper point about Parallel Streams should a senior Java developer mention?
- At senior level, the right answer is that Parallel Streams exists mostly for historical syntax reasons.
- At senior level, the JVM removes the tradeoffs around Parallel Streams, so design choices barely matter.
- Parallel performance depends on split cost, merge cost, data size, and fork-join scheduling overhead rather than on the parallel() call alone.
- At senior level, any approach to Parallel Streams is equally correct if it compiles and passes a small test.
Hint
Look beyond syntax and explain the runtime, API, or design consequence.
Answer and rationale
Correct answer: C. Parallel performance depends on split cost, merge cost, data size, and fork-join scheduling overhead rather than on the parallel() call alone.
Parallel performance depends on split cost, merge cost, data size, and fork-join scheduling overhead rather than on the parallel() call alone. This is the kind of tradeoff-aware answer senior interviews usually expect.
Track: Java