Question
Which practice avoids a common mistake with ConcurrentLinkedQueue?
- Ignore the ConcurrentLinkedQueue issue and rely on team discipline instead of APIs or contracts.
- Silence the ConcurrentLinkedQueue problem by using raw types, broad catches, or shared mutable state.
- Prefer the version of ConcurrentLinkedQueue that makes behavior less predictable as long as the code compiles.
- Do not assume a concurrent queue provides backpressure, capacity limits, or blocking semantics by default.
Hint
Look for the option that protects correctness instead of hiding the problem.
Answer and rationale
Correct answer: D. Do not assume a concurrent queue provides backpressure, capacity limits, or blocking semantics by default.
Do not assume a concurrent queue provides backpressure, capacity limits, or blocking semantics by default. This is a common failure mode in real Java code and a frequent interview follow-up.
Track: Java